STEP should not require any tessellation, which usually seems to give cleaner results with less faceting (a good example of this is shown in post #14 in the thread linked above). When I brought this thread up to the team, some of them were surprised to hear that you were receiving better results from the STL than STEP format. I reached out to some of the folks who have worked with Keyshot more extensively and they mentioned that the translation is an STL transfer with some attention to RGB color and pre-linking of materials, which may help to improve results. The Keyshot plugin does export a mesh, so there will be some tessellation.To try to answer your specific questions: Hi for posting! While I can't provide too much detail on the back end operations between Fusion and Keyshot (I'm not a developer ), I may be able to give some insight here.įirst off, I'm glad to hear the Keyshot plugin is working well for you! We've seen reports of almost the opposite behavior you have described on this thread, so I am glad to hear you are getting good results. How can the data transfer logic used in the Keyshot plugin be extended to other modeling applications, especially Autodesk applications, e.g.does it contain proprietary mesh conversion algos that Autodesk does not support? Is this plugin developed in collaboration with Luxion, e.g.Why is the mesh conversion method used in the Keyshot plugin so superior to the.Why is there virtually no quality loss when sending a model directly to Keyshot, but sometimes quality loss when exporting to a native file format?.When I send a model to Keyshot, the transfer is nearly instantaneous and the form is completely unaffected - better than highest precision STL export and *much* faster. obj), but far and away the cleanest transfer of data is between Fusion 360 and Keyshot. I have tried exporting bodies / surfaces from Fusion 360 in just about every possible manner, with varying degrees of success and importing into 3ds Max, Zbrush, etc. Different file formats produce different levels of quality (e.g.
0 kommentar(er)
